Reeves & Co. v. Cress
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Mower county to recover $740 for goods sold and delivered. Defendants by amended answer set up a counterclaim. The case was tried before Kingsley, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of defendants for the amount claimed. From an order denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.
This is the second appeal of this action. On the former review (73 Minn. 261, 76 N. W. 26), it was reversed for error in the reception of testimony. The suit is maintained to recover the purchase price of a threshing outfit, consisting of a Beeves separator, wind stacker, weigher, and feeder, conditionally sold by plaintiff to de-. fendants. Defendants, subsequent to the last trial, with leave of court, amended their answer, setting up a counterclaim which had not been previously pleaded, but upon which they recovered a verdict in this suit for the amount claimed therein, and this appeal is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re Hess' EstateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Oster v. MickleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Adamson v. WigginsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Burke v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Reeves & Co. v. CressSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Todd v. BetttngenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Baxter v. BrandenburgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Trainor v. SchutzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Turner v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Evenson v. Keystone Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.