Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Pigeon Forge

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1980PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FONES, Justice.

This declaratory judgment action seeks to have ordinance 143 of the City of Pigeon Forge and its enabling act, chapter 808, Public Acts of 1976, declared unconstitutional. Ordinance 143 levies a privilege tax of one percent upon the gross receipts of all business conducted in Pigeon Forge. The City of Pigeon Forge and the attorney general answered denying that the ordinance or the statute are unconstitutional, and all parties filed motions for summary judgment, supported by affidavits. The trial court found that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact, granted…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McConnell v. City of LebanonTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Stalcup v. City of GatlinburgTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Beery v. Shelby CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Ferrell v. DoakTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Mayor of Fayetteville v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gibson County Special School District v. PalmerTennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. BondsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2015
  3. Lowe's Companies, Inc. v. CardwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Nolichuckey Sand Co. v. HuddlestonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  5. City of Pigeon Forge, Tennessee v. Midland Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API