Legal Opinion

Nolichuckey Sand Co. v. Huddleston

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided November 29, 1994PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUSANO, Judge.

In this case, Nolichuckey Sand Co., Inc. (Nolichuckey), appeals and argues that the county option mineral severance tax (severance tax) codified at T.C.A. § 67-7-201, et seq., is constitutionally infirm in toto. After initially agreeing with the Appellant, the Chancellor reconsidered his decision and held that the doctrine of elision could be applied to salvage the basic provisions of the tax. The Chancellor proceeded to carve out and strike down the population-based exclusions found at T.C.A § 67-7-211 and the tax refund and rebate provisions (including more…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. SligerTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Davis-Kidd Booksellers, Inc. v. McWherterTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Estrin v. MossTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
  4. DAVIDSON COUNTY v. ElrodTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Gibson County Special School District v. PalmerTennessee Supreme Court · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kottel v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Tebow v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Admiralty Suites And Inns, LLC v. Shelby County, TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
  4. Kentucky-Tennessee Clay Co. v. HuddlestonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  5. Dr. Pepper Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of Dyersburg, LLC v. Reagan Farr, Commissioner of Tennessee Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API