Sitkin v. Smith
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
This action grows out of a building contract, dated October 19th, 1926, in which Sam A. Smith as contractor agreed to furnish all material and provide all work according to specifications and drawings, and to complete within ninety days from date of contract, under the direction and to the satisfaction of her architect, a brick residence for Frances B. Sitkin, on lot 4, block 19, Story addition to the city of Phoenix, for $6,300. November 2d, 1927, Frances B. Sitkin, joined by her husband, Frank L. Sitkin, brought this action against Smith and his surety, the Employers’ Liability Assurance…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bartlett v. StanchfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- O'Loughlin v. PoliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
- West Haven Water Co. v. RedfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
- Galpin v. AtwaterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1860
- Hildreth v. Hartford, Manchester & Rockville Tramway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pioneer Roofing Co. v. Mardian Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Freeman v. Stanbern Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- Eng v. SteinArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- O'Malley Investment and Realty Co. v. TrimbleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- Harrington v. McCarthyIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.