Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority & Gholson
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 13, 1979PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Arthur S. Hirsch, J.
Respondent, Willie Gholson, seeking no-fault benefits for an incident which occurred on a bus driven by him, served a demand for arbitration dated March 4, 1978. Petitioner Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority (Authority) moves for an order staying arbitration between the respondent and the Authority.
The facts of the incident are not in dispute. Gholson, employed by petitioner as a bus operator, received his injuries when he was attacked with a knife wielded by an irate passenger who was angered because respondent driver would not…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Montgomery v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Tickner v. Rochester-Genesee Regional Transportation AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1976
3Cited by13 opinions
- Texas Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. SturrockTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Schweitzer v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- In re the Arbitration between Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority & GholsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Tyrrell v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Tyrrell v. Farmers InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.