State v. Tillman
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.
¶ 1. In State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 181-82, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994), the supreme court held that: (1) all grounds for relief under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2003-04) 1 must be raised in a petitioner's original, supplemental, or amended motion; (2) an issue finally adjudicated in a prior postconviction motion may not serve as the basis for a further § 974.06 motion; and (3) issues that could have been, but were not, raised in an earlier § 974.06 motion may not be raised in a later motion unless the party establishes "sufficient reason" for failing to previously raise the issues.
¶ 2.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. Escalona-NaranjoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. EricksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. LoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. BodohWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- State Ex Rel. Office of the State Public Defender v. Court of AppealsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
- State Ex Rel. Panama v. HeppCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
- State v. ParentWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Crawford v. EplettDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2023
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.