Legal Opinion

State v. Tillman

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 30, 2005No. 04-0966PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.

¶ 1. In State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 181-82, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994), the supreme court held that: (1) all grounds for relief under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2003-04) 1 must be raised in a petitioner's original, supplemental, or amended motion; (2) an issue finally adjudicated in a prior postconviction motion may not serve as the basis for a further § 974.06 motion; and (3) issues that could have been, but were not, raised in an earlier § 974.06 motion may not be raised in a later motion unless the party establishes "sufficient reason" for failing to previously raise the issues.

¶ 2.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. Escalona-NaranjoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. EricksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. LoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. BodohWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State Ex Rel. Office of the State Public Defender v. Court of AppealsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State Ex Rel. Panama v. HeppCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
  4. State v. ParentWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Crawford v. EplettDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2023

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API