Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Panama v. Hepp

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 7, 2008No. 2008AP84-WPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. Jarrad Panama filed a motion seeking to extend the time to file a postconviction motion in this matter, on the grounds that counsel and this court failed to identify an arguably meritorious plea-breach issue during Panama's prior no-merit appeal. Because we had already affirmed Panama's judgment of conviction in the no-merit proceeding, we construed the extension motion as a Knight petition and directed the parties to file memoranda. See State v. Knight, 168 Wis. 2d 509, 520, 484 N.W.2d 540 (1992) (holding that a habeas corpus petition filed in the court of appeals is the proper vehicle…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. MacHnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. Escalona-NaranjoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. KnightWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State Ex Rel. Rothering v. Mc CaughtryCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  5. State v. LoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ThurmerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. McGee v. BartowCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. State v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Morales v. BoatwrightCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  5. Northern v. BoatwrightCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API