Legal Opinion

United States v. Kahn

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 21, 1966PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLEAN, District Judge.

Defendants have been indicted for endeavoring to influence a government witness and for obstructing the due administration of justice, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1503, and for conspiracy to do so, and to suborn perjury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Defendants now move, pursuant to Rule 41(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, to suppress certain recordings of conversations between defendant Kahn and the witness, Charles Hedges, and “all evidence pertinent thereto.” I held a hearing and took testimony on this motion. The facts developed at this hearing are…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Silverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. KingDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1971
  2. Robinson v. AriyoshiHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  3. United States v. BrownDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1970
  4. In re KahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  5. State v. FischerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API