State v. Rue
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Duane Rue appeals his escape conviction. Rue argues, under the circumstances, the escape statute does not apply. Alternatively, Rue argues, if the statute does apply, his conduct constituted a misdemeanor rather than a felony. Concluding the escape statute applies to the circumstances, and concluding the record supports Rue’s felony conviction, we affirm.
I
[¶ 2] In July 1998, Rue pled guilty to terrorizing, a class C felony. Rue was imprisoned for six months and thereafter was released subject to supervision of a probation officer. On March 3, 2000, alleging Rue had…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. OlanderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. DeCoteauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. RambousekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. GelvinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. NehringNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. BecirajNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Harter v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. DennisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. GeiserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.