Legal Opinion

State v. Rue

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 2001No. 20000317PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Duane Rue appeals his escape conviction. Rue argues, under the circumstances, the escape statute does not apply. Alternatively, Rue argues, if the statute does apply, his conduct constituted a misdemeanor rather than a felony. Concluding the escape statute applies to the circumstances, and concluding the record supports Rue’s felony conviction, we affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In July 1998, Rue pled guilty to terrorizing, a class C felony. Rue was imprisoned for six months and thereafter was released subject to supervision of a probation officer. On March 3, 2000, alleging Rue had…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. OlanderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. DeCoteauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. RambousekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. GelvinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. NehringNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. BecirajNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Harter v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. DennisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. GeiserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API