Legal Opinion

Advanced Property Tax Liens, Inc. v. Sherman

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 26, 2011No. 1 CA-CV 10-0371PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GEMMILL, Judge.

¶ 1 Alen and Heidi Sherman (collectively “Shermans”) appeal the denial of their motion to set aside Advanced Property Tax Liens, Inc.’s (“APT’s”) default judgment for the foreclosure of real property owned by the Shermans. Because we conclude that APT did not comply with the statutory notice requirement, we reverse the denial of the Sher-mans’ motion.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶ 2 On May 5, 2000, the Shermans acquired three parcels of commercial property located in Maricopa County. The parcels had the following Accessor Parcel Numbers (“APN”): 010H (“H parcel”), 010J…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ezell v. QuonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  2. NEW SUN BUSINESS PARK, LLC v. Yuma CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  3. Springfield Credit Union v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  4. M & M Auto Storage Pool, Inc. v. Chemical Waste Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  5. Morgan v. Carillon Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. AEA Federal Credit Union v. Yuma Funding, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  2. State v. GillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. Bell v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  4. State of Arizona v. Nicolas LuvianoArizona Supreme Court · 2023
  5. 4qtkidz LLC v. Hnt Holdings llc/beth FordArizona Supreme Court · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API