Legal Opinion

Bell v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 30, 2014No. 1 CA-IC 12-0048PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*114OPINION

GEMMILL, Judge.

¶ 1 This is a special action review of an Industrial Commission of Arizona (“ICA”) award and decision upon review denying temporary partial disability benefits to petitioner Linda Bell. The issue presented is whether the “waiting period” established by Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 23-1062(B) has been satisfied. We conclude that the law and the record support the decision of the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) that Bell did not satisfy the waiting period. We therefore affirm the award and decision upon review.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 On February 24,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Phoenix v. HarnishCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  2. Morgan v. Carillon Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  3. County of Maricopa v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  4. Morgan v. CARILLON INVESTMENTS, INC.Arizona Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Advanced Property Tax Liens, Inc. v. ShermanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Linda Bell v. Ica/ Maricopa Cty/ Pinnacle RiskArizona Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API