Legal Opinion

Crist v. City of Beaverton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 28, 1996No. LUBA 96-081; CA A93482PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Petitioner seeks review of LUBA’s dismissal, for lack of jurisdiction, of her appeal from an action by the City of Beaverton. We affirm.

The city and respondent The Aspen Group, Inc. (respondent) entered into a “preannexation agreement,” relating to property in unincorporated Washington County, where respondent seeks to locate and operate a planned unit development (PUD). Petitioner appealed the consummation of the agreement to LUBA. She contends generally that the agreement enables and/or requires the city to annex the area after Washington County has approved the PUD and, without following…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Doughton v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. League of Women Voters v. Coos CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. Doughton v. Douglas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. Flowers v. Klamath CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. Sauvie Island Agricultural League v. GGS (Hawaii), Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wicks-Snodgrass v. City of ReedsportCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. State Ex Rel. Aspen Group, Inc. v. Washington County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Bowerman v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. Marks v. LCDCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  5. State ex rel. Moore v. City of FairviewCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API