Wicks-Snodgrass v. City of Reedsport
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.
Respondents Wicks-Snodgrass and Lewis 1 appealed to LUBA from petitioner City of Reedsport’s decision allowing an application for a residential subdivision, together with certain related applications. The city’s decision became final on November 6, 1995, but notice of it was not mailed to the parties pursuant to ORS 227.173(3) 2 until the next day. ORS 197.830(8) requires, as a prerequisite to LUBA’s jurisdiction, that a notice of intent to appeal to LUBA from a local land use decision “be filed not later than 21 days after the date the decision sought to be reviewed becomes final.”…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Far West Landscaping, Inc. v. Pacific Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. WaterhouseOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Junction City Water Control District v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- League of Women Voters v. Coos CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Southwood Homeowners Ass'n v. City Council of PhilomathCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Kotera v. Daioh International U.S.A. Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- National Mortgage Co. v. Robert C. Wyatt, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Wood v. James W. Fowler Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Dreher v. SmithsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Rogue Advocates v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.