Legal Opinion

Wicks-Snodgrass v. City of Reedsport

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 28, 1997No. 95-240; CA A96236PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Respondents Wicks-Snodgrass and Lewis 1 appealed to LUBA from petitioner City of Reedsport’s decision allowing an application for a residential subdivision, together with certain related applications. The city’s decision became final on November 6, 1995, but notice of it was not mailed to the parties pursuant to ORS 227.173(3) 2 until the next day. ORS 197.830(8) requires, as a prerequisite to LUBA’s jurisdiction, that a notice of intent to appeal to LUBA from a local land use decision “be filed not later than 21 days after the date the decision sought to be reviewed becomes final.”…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Far West Landscaping, Inc. v. Pacific Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. WaterhouseOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Junction City Water Control District v. ElliottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. League of Women Voters v. Coos CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. Southwood Homeowners Ass'n v. City Council of PhilomathCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kotera v. Daioh International U.S.A. Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. National Mortgage Co. v. Robert C. Wyatt, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. Wood v. James W. Fowler Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Dreher v. SmithsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Rogue Advocates v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API