Legal Opinion
Diaz v. Paul J. Kennedy Law Firm
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 14, 2002No. 01-2103PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Carlos L. and Myrna Diaz, proceeding pro se, brought suit against defendants Paul J. Kennedy and Mary Y.C. Han (attorneys and members of defendant The Paul J. Kennedy Law Firm) alleging violations of the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act of 1970 (RICO) and asserting numerous state law claims. 1 The district court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment on all of plaintiffs’ claims. Plaintiffs appeal and we affirm.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs retained defendants in October 1999 to represent them in criminal cases filed in the New Mexico…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hall v. BellmonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Munoz v. St. Mary-Corwin HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Debra WeismanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. SimonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Walters Ex Rel. Walters v. HastingsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- C.T. v. Liberal School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2008
- McQueen, Rains & Tresch, LLP v. CITGO Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Garcia v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2011
- In re Urethane Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2012
- Hilary Marek Winniczek and Danuta Winniczek v. Sheldon B. NagelbergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.