Legal Opinion

In re Urethane Antitrust Litigation

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided December 18, 2012No. MDL No. 1616; Case No. 04-1616-JWLPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOHN W. LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.

In this multi-district class action, plaintiffs allege that remaining defendant Dow Chemical Company (“Dow”) conspired with other manufacturers to fix prices for certain urethane chemical products in violation of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. This matter presently comes before the Court on Dow’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 2402). For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies the motion for summary judgment in its entirety.1

I. Background

In this litigation, the Court has consolidated two sets of cases relating to different…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In re Polyurethane Foam Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2015
  2. Austin v. Recover-Care HealthcareDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2024
  3. Brown v. JBS USA Food CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2023
  4. Dena Burge, Leigh Hockett, Jordan Furlan, Anne Arundel County, Maryland, Cristine Ridey, and Patricia Sawczuk, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries, Ltd., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc., Teva Neuroscience, Inc., Teva Sales & Marketing, Inc., Cephalon, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2026
  5. Dena Burge, Leigh Hockett, Jordan Furlan, Cristine Ridey, Patricia Sawczuk, and Anne Arundel County, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries, Ltd., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc., Teva Neuroscience, Inc., Teva Sales & Marketing, Inc., and Cephalon, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2025

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API