Legal Opinion

Hart v. QUEEN CITY COACH COMPANY

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 14, 1955No. 677PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The critical question presented by this appeal is whether the record presents evidence to support the findings of Judge Gwyn that the appealing defendants were nonresidents of North Carolina on 4 January, 1954, the date of the accident, and could be brought into court by service on the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles under G.S. 1-105. If there is supporting evidence, we are bound by the findings. Bigham v. Foor, 201 N.C. 14, 158 S.E. 548.

The briefs in this case on the question of residence are full and have been prepared with much care. We have examined the many cases cited. They arise under…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Central Manufacturers' Mutual Insurance v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  2. Bigham v. . FoorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Howard v. SassoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Coble v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Israel v. IsraelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Denton v. EllisDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1966
  5. Coiner v. CalesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API