Legal Opinion

Jack v. Wood

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 5, 1968No. Civ. No. 8383PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GABBERT, J. pro tem.*

This sis an action by a business invitee against a building maintenance operator to recover for personal injuries suffered as the result of a fall. Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendant. In this opinion we sustain plaintiff’s contention that a triable issue of fact has been raised in the declarations in opposition to the motion.

By her complaint plaintiff seeks to recover damages from Wood for personal injuries suffered as a result of a fall. Her cause of action grows out of the fact that defendant Wood, doing business as K. W. Building…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Coyne v. KrempelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Canifax v. Hercules Powder Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Cone v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Palmquist v. MercerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jack v. WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API