United States v. John W. Kenney
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
The sole question in this direct appeal is whether John Kenney’s conviction for possession of a machine gun is invalid because the criminal statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(o), is unconstitutional. He argues that the Supreme Court’s reasoning in United States v. Lopez, — U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 1624, 131 L.Ed.2d 626 (1995), demonstrates that § 922(o) exceeds the scope of Congress’s legislative power under the Commerce Clause, U.S. Const. Art. I, § 8, el. 3. The magistrate judge agreed and recommended granting Kenney’s motion to dismiss the indictment, but the district court took the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- United States v. Carlton E. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Ralph Wayne AngleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Charles W. WestbrookCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Joseph RodiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Raymond Rybar, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.