United States v. Joseph Rodia
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Chief Judge.
This appeal requires us once again to determine, in the wake of United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549, 115 S.Ct. 1624, 131 L.Ed.2d 626 (1995), the constitutionality of a statute criminalizing an activity that is not directly linked to interstate commerce. The precise question before us is whether it was within Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause to enact 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(B), which imposes criminal liability on individuals who possess child pornography that has not itself traveled in interstate commerce as long as one of the materials from…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- United States v. KimlerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. RiccardiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Jamaal Adeem Atif Singletary, A/K/A Jamal Singletary A/K/A Curtis Singletary Jamaal SingletaryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Ralph Wayne AngleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. James E. MacEwanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.