Legal Opinion

Fero v. Fero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1901PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal . by the plaintiff, Mary A. Fero, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Steuben on the 24th day of October, 1900, upon the decision of the court, rendered after a trial at ■ the Steuben Special Term, sustaining a demurrer to .the complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

Adams, P. J.:

On the 7th day of March, 1900, one Glen D. Fero, the infant son of the plaintiff, was married to the defendant, and this action is brought under the provisions of section 1750 of the Code of Civil Procedure to have such marriage annulled and declared void upon *471the ground that the consent thereto of the plaintiff’s son was obtained by force, duress or fraud.

The complaint alleges the marriage, the circumstances constituting the force, duress or fraud which induced the same, and that the parties to the marriage have never voluntarily cohabited together as husband and wife. To this…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re HollopeterWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Wood v. BakerNew York Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Coddington v. LarnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  4. Anderson v. HicksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  5. Feldman v. IntratorNew York Supreme Court · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API