Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Hicks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 19, 1912PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, James M. Anderson, committee, etc., from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Westchester Special Term, and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Westchester on the 13th day of March, 1911, granting the defendant’s motion to vacate a judgment for the annulment of a marriage.

1Opinion of the Court

Carr, J.:

■ In 1888 one Eugene Anderson was adjudged an incompetent by reason of habitual drunkenness, and his; brother, James M. Anderson, was appointed committee of his person, while one Walter Edwards was appointed committee of his estate. The incompetent was sent by the committee of his person to a “Home” at Amityville, L. I. There he Was allowed a large measure of personal freedom, which he took advantage of to have himself married ceremonially to a female inmate named Hicks, likewise there detained as an habitual drunkard under the direction of her committee. This happened in June, 1894.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wadsworth v. . Sharpsteen and MoffatNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  2. Lewis v. JonesNew York Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Payne v. BurdetteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Pharis v. . GereNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  5. Fero v. FeroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McClure v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Husted v. HustedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Presbrey v. PresbreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  4. Adams v. VulovichNew York Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API