In re Hollopeter
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurs-ton county, Irwin, J., entered August 24, 1908, upon findings annuling a marriage, and denying a writ of habeas corpus sought by the husband to secure the release of his wife, after a trial on the merits of habeas corpus proceedings, consolidated for trial with an action by the wife’s parents for the annulment of the marriage.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
This was an action brought originally by Grover Hollopeter, as husband of Imogene Hollopeter, on her behalf, alleging that Nat Glenn and Mrs. Nat Glenn, her parents, were restraining her of her liberty. From the petition and return, it appears, that on the 7th day of July, 1908, petitioner procured a marriage license to be issued by the county auditor of Thurston county, authorizing the marriage of Grover Hollopeter and Imogene Glenn; that they were married on the same day by a minister of the gospel; that they went on a wedding trip to North Yakima and Tacoma, where they remained several…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ridgely v. RidgelyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
- Fero v. FeroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Wood v. BakerNew York Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by28 opinions
- Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kuehmsted v. TurnwallSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Smith v. SeiblyWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Boehm v. RohlfsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
- In Re Estate of RomanoWashington Supreme Court · 1952
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.