Legal Opinion

Carlstrom v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 7, 1959No. 542-57PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This case was referred by the court, pursuant to Rule 45(a), 28 U.S.C.A., to S. R. Gamer, a trial commissioner of the court, with directions to make findings of fact and recommendations for conclusions of law. The commissioner has done so in a report filed May 28, 1959. When more than the specified time elapsed after the filing of this report and neither party gave notice in writing of an intention to except to it, defendant filed a motion for judgment based on the commissioner’s report. Since the court agrees with the recommendations and findings of the commissioner, as hereinafter set…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Matson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
  3. Britton v. Western Iowa Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  4. Arkansas Valley Ry., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1946
  5. Riverside Military Academy, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Miller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  2. Pitcairn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  3. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  4. King v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  5. American Chemical Society v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API