Kargus v. State
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Luckert, J.:
This case raises two principal questions. First, does a criminal defendant whose felony conviction and sentence have been affirmed by the Court of Appeals have a right to effective assistance of appellate counsel when filing a petition requesting this court’s discretionary review of the Court of Appeals’ decision? Second, if a defendant does have such a right in a direct appeal, is the right denied when counsel fails to file a petition after die defendant has requested that a petition be filed? To resolve the second question, we must decide…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Garza v. IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
- State v. PattonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- State v. LawsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.