Legal Opinion
Polhill v. Buckley
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided September 9, 1996No. 96SA257Published
1Opinion of the Court
923 P.2d 119 (1996)
Dennis POLHILL, David Aitken, Charles A. Michael, Douglas Stuart Campbell, and Gary Swing, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Victoria BUCKLEY, in her official capacity as Colorado Secretary of State, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 96SA257.
Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.
September 9, 1996.
Paul Grant, Parker, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
Gale A. Norton, Attorney General, Stephen K. ErkenBrack, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Timothy M. Tymkovich, Solicitor General, Maurice G. Knaizer, Deputy Attorney General, State Services Section, Denver, for Defendant-Appellee.
Chief Justice VOLLACK delivered…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Romer v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Burke v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Conrad v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Bickel v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Colorado General Assembly v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.