BMY—Combat Systems Division of Harsco Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:
Plaintiff filed suit in this court in 1990 seeking an equitable adjustment to its contract with the United States. Defendant asserts counterclaims under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729 (1994), a special plea in fraud pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2514 (1994), and breach of contract. The court has jurisdiction to entertain this matter pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 601-613 (1994). This opinion follows a trial on liability held in Washington, D.C. from July 8 to July 29, 1996. Quantum was not considered. For the reasons set forth below,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. BornsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Terence George KellyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Ronald H. Selle v. Barry Gibb, and Ronald H. Selle v. Barry GibbCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Shaw v. AAA Engineering & Drafting, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- First Federal Savings Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Morse Diesel International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- United States Ex Rel. Roby v. Boeing Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
- Landmark Land Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.