Legal Opinion
Cillo v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 7, 2003No. 2D01-4394PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OLIVER L. GREEN, Senior Judge.
Frank Paul Cilio appeals his judgments for committing a lewd, lascivious or indecent act on a child less than sixteen years of age. He argues that the trial court erred in denying the motion to suppress his confession because the confession was obtained in violation of his Miranda1 rights. The trial court denied the motion, finding that Mr. Cilio was not in custody when the statements were made and that the statements were voluntary. We affirm.
When reviewing a motion to suppress, the standard of review for the trial court’s application of the law to its factual…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ramirez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. PittsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Rigterink v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
- Bautista v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- S.V.J. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Cotton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.