Legal Opinion

United States v. P.R. Indus. Dev. Co.

United States District Court

Decided December 7, 2017No. Civil No. 15–2328 (FAB)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BESOSA, District Judge.

*137On September 25, 2015 the United States of America ("United States") filed a complaint against the Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company ("PRIDCO") pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA"), 42 U.S.C. § 9607 et seq. (Docket No. 1.) Subsequently, the United States filed an amended complaint. (Docket No. 8.) PRIDCO answered the amended complaint. (Docket No. 11.) Additionally, PRIDCO filed a third party complaint. (Docket No. 46.) The United States moved for summary judgment against PRIDCO pursuant to Federal Rule…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. Milissa Garside v. Osco Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Puerto Rico Indus. Dev. Co.United States District Court · 2019
  2. United States v. PR Industrial Development Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
  3. United States v. Puerto Rico Indus. Dev. Co.United States District Court · 2019
  4. United States v. Puerto Rico Indus. Dev. Co.United States District Court · 2019
  5. Gould Electronics Inc. v. Livingston County Road CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API