Legal Opinion
Kimball v. Hastings Tract Reclamation District No. 2060
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 3, 1934No. Civ. No. 5062PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
This is an appeal from a writ of mandsimus issued by the Superior Court of Solano County, directing the treasurer of a reclamation district to distribute a portion of a special fund collected pursuant to a levy assessed for the special purpose of paying particular matured bonds and the accrued interest thereon, in settlement of future obligations of the district, other than the ones for which the call was made.
The appellant is a reclamation district which was organized under the laws of California, February 15, 1922. It comprises 7,396.77 acres of land in Solano County. Pursuant to section…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Conway v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Jewell v. City of SuperiorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1904
- Rohwer v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- People ex rel. Cameron v. FlynnIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
- Cooper v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
3Cited by3 opinions
- Selby v. Oakdale Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Bank of Hawaii v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Bekins v. HeikenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940