Legal Opinion
Zawels v. Edutronics, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 23, 1994No. C8-94-449PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
In this misappropriation of trade secrets action, appellant Edutronics argues that the district court erred in awarding exemplary damages and attorney fees to respondent Jacob Zawels without following the procedures in Minn.Stat. §§ 549.191-.20 (1990) or making the findings required by Minn.Stat. §§ 325C.03(b)-.04 (1990). We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent Jacob Zawels developed Discourse, a computer-based, interactive teaching system. Zawels obtained a patent for Discourse and entered into licensing and vendor agreements with Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing (3M). In…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Carpenter v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Jack Frost, Inc. v. Engineered Building Components Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Schumacher v. IhrkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Yeti by Molly Ltd. v. Deckers Outdoor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Micro Data Base Systems, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Dharma Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Advanced Fluid Sys., Inc. v. Kevin Huber, Insysma (Integrated Sys. & Mach., LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Backlund v. City of DuluthDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- Yeti By Molly Ltd v. Deckers Outdoor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001