Legal Opinion
Lund's, Inc. v. Chemical Bank
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 16, 1989No. Nos. 976, 1109, 1111, Dockets 87-7605, 87-7607, 87-7625PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAHONEY, Circuit Judge:
We consider here appeals and a cross-appeal from summary judgments entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Robert W. Sweet, Judge, for plaintiffs-cross-appellees Lund’s, Inc. and Wardwell M. Montgomery (“Montgomery”) against defendant-cross-appellant-appellee and third-party plaintiff Chemical Bank (“Chemical”), and for Chemical against plaintiff-appellant Russell T. Lund, Jr. (“Lund”).1 Judgment was also entered for Chemical for indemnification against third-party defendant-appellant Laidlaw Adams & Peck Inc. (“Laidlaw”) (1)…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Neumeier v. KuehnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Allen v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- United States Gold Corp. v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Allen v. Coughlin IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Lund's, Inc. And Wardwell M. Montgomery, Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellees, Russell T. Lund, Jr. v. Chemical Bank, Defendant-Cross-Appellant-Appellee. Chemical Bank, and Third-Party v. Laidlaw Adams & Peck Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989