Legal Opinion
Lund's, Inc. And Wardwell M. Montgomery, Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellees, Russell T. Lund, Jr. v. Chemical Bank, Defendant-Cross-Appellant-Appellee. Chemical Bank, and Third-Party v. Laidlaw Adams & Peck Inc., Third-Party
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 16, 1989No. 1109Published
1Opinion of the Court
870 F.2d 840
8 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 731
LUND'S, INC. and Wardwell M. Montgomery, Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellees,
Russell T. Lund, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CHEMICAL BANK, Defendant-Cross-Appellant-Appellee.
CHEMICAL BANK, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff,
v.
LAIDLAW ADAMS & PECK INC., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.
Nos. 976, 1109, 1111, Dockets 87-7605, 87-7607, 87-7625.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued April 26, 1988.
Decided March 16, 1989.
Jonathan C. Thau, New York City (Maura E. Mahon, Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, New York City, of counsel), for third-party…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Neumeier v. KuehnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.