Citizens for Pennsylvania's Future v. Pittsburgh Water & Sewer Authority
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROBERT C. MITCHELL, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Presently for disposition is the Defendants’, Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority’s (“PWSA”) and the City of Pittsburgh’s (the “City”), Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 71]. For the following reasons, the Defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.1
II. BACKGROUND
Defendants have previously moved for summary judgment on the basis argued herein, however because of the lack of legal authority in both parties’ briefs justifying the applicability of the 2010 Ordinance, this court…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. HIF Bio, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Hedges v. MuscoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jones Creek Investors, LLC v. Columbia CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2015