Legal Opinion

Iheme v. Simmons

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided July 23, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Alexander Graves, J.

I hereby find and decide that during the course of this trial, plaintiffs attorney proposed to read from the examination before trial of William Stotts. Since counsel was unable to establish that diligent efforts had been made to produce the attendance of Mr. Stotts at the trial, paragraph (3) of CPLR 3117 (a), allowing the use of the deposition of any person by any party for any purpose against any other party who had notice of the deposition, could not be utilized. Accordingly, *224application was made under CPLR 3117 (a) (2), which permits the use of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nedball v. TellefsenNew York Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brown v. Daniel Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  2. In re New York City Asbestos LitigationNew York Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Brown v. Daniel Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  4. Martinez v. Top 99 DiscountCivil Court of the City of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API