Legal Opinion
Nedball v. Tellefsen
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 14, 1980PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Arthur W. Lonschein, J.
May a party at the trial of an action read into evidence the *590deposition of one who was an adverse party at the time of the taking of the deposition but who, at the time of the trial, is no longer a party because of the voluntary discontinuance by the party who seeks to read from his deposition?
The plaintiff was a passenger in a taxicab driven by one Petsiavis, which struck a truck driven by the defendant Tellefsen. Plaintiff thereafter commenced this action against both Petsiavis and Tellefsen to recover for her injuries. Prior to trial and pursuant…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Richard v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1965
- Rajcic v. SissonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brown v. Daniel Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- State University Construction Fund v. Kipphut & Neuman Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Iheme v. SimmonsCivil Court of the City of New York · 1990
- Brown v. Daniel Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Marte v. SpeakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.