Legal Opinion

Martinez v. Top 99 Discount

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided February 9, 2004Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Eileen N. Nadelson, J.

During opening argument plaintiffs counsel objected to the reference by defendant’s counsel to the deposition of a defendant who had been stipulated out of the action by plaintiff. Plaintiffs counsel based his objection on the fact that defendant had neither indicated that the former defendant was unavailable to testify nor that he would be called as a witness. The court reserved its decision on the objection and defendant’s *224counsel agreed to withhold mention of the subject deposition during his opening statements.

The use of depositions at trial are…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nedball v. TellefsenNew York Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State University Construction Fund v. Kipphut & Neuman Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Lincoln Industrial Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Iheme v. SimmonsCivil Court of the City of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API