Legal Opinion
Winberg v. University of Minnesota
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 16, 1992No. C3-91-2224, CX-91-2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD D. MULALLY, Judge.*
Appellant University of Minnesota (“University”) challenges the decisions of the Commissioner of Veterans Affairs and a district court which determined that the Veterans Preference Act applies to the Uni*327versity of Minnesota. The appeals were consolidated. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent Roger L. Winberg is an honorably discharged veteran. He applied for various positions with the University and was not hired. In March 1991, he petitioned the Commissioner of Veterans Affairs for relief, alleging the University had violated the Veterans Preference Act (“Act”). A…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Arvig Telephone Co. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State Ex Rel. University of Minnesota v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Geldert v. American National BankCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Winberg v. University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Winberg v. University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992