Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Baker & Botts, L.L.P.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided September 30, 1999No. 01-97-00616-CVPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER, Chief Justice.

Appellants appeal a jury’s verdict finding no liability on their legal malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, and deceptive trade practices claims against appellees, Baker & Botts, L.L.P. We affirm.

The Partial Record

As a preliminary matter, Baker & Botts argues the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed because appellants failed to comply with former Rule of Appellate Procedure 53(d)1 in requesting a partial statement of facts.

Following trial, counsel for appellants asked the court reporter to prepare the statement of facts, excluding voir…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Englander Co. v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Schafer v. ConnerTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. CMM Grain Co., Inc. v. OzgunduzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. Superior Packing, Inc. v. Worldwide Leasing & Financing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Richards v. Schion, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. W & F Transportation, Inc. v. Wilhelm, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  2. Mason v. Our Lady Star of the Sea Catholic Church, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  3. MacArina Garcia and Juan Figueroa v. Eli Gavriel Sasson, SeniorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  4. Brown v. McGuyer Homebuilders, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  5. Hilton v. Hillman Distributing Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API