Legal Opinion

Durr v. Hardesty

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1956No. File 9539PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCLASKEY, Circuit Judge.

On January 31, 1931 defendants Hardesty and King executed a note to First National Bank of Belle Fourche, South Dakota. It became due October 15, 1931. In 1939, the bank having failed, the note was sold by the receiver' to plaintiff, then and since a resident of Belle Fourche. Suit was commenced on April 12, 1952. In the course of the trial it became apparent that the six-year period of limitation had run against Hardesty and as to him the case was abandoned by plaintiff. Trial was continued against King and the issues herein involve him alone. For convenience the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Darling v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Cutler v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  3. Mack v. MendelsNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Cole v. . JessupNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  5. Busby v. ShaferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. American Property Services, Inc. v. BarringerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. MeansSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Chipperfield v. WoessnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Sabbagh v. Professional & Business Men's Life Ins. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Moulton v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API