Legal Opinion

George and Rosemary Wellington v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 7, 1983No. 82-2318, 82-2319PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

George and Rosemary Wellington, husband and wife, appeal from the Board of Immigration Appeals’ orders affirming the decision of an Immigration Judge finding George deportable as an “overstay,” and finding Rosemary deportable for failing to comply with the conditions of her nonimmi-grant status and for failing to maintain that status. For reversal George argues that he was denied due process when the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) failed to give him timely notice of its denial of an extension of stay. And Rosemary argues that (1) the INS did not meet its…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Cheng Fan Kwok v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service v. HibiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Ho Chong Tsao, Hung Hoi Che, Cheung Chan v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert Asmar and Kathleen AsmarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  2. Saad Zerrei v. Alberto R. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Homayoun BazarganCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  4. Velazquez v. Immigration & Naturalization ServicesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
  5. Ijoma v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API