Legal Opinion
United States v. Mesna
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided November 18, 1950No. Civ. A. No. 3338PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion pursuant to Rule 39 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., for-transfer of the action to the jury calendar from the court calendar.
Defendants own a multiple dwelling property which plaintiff contends is and has been subject to the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix §§ 1881 et seq., during all times relevant to this action. The action is brought by plaintiff (1) to obtain an injunction prohibiting defendants from charging rent in excess of the legal maximum rent set for the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Hepner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- United States v. JepsonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1950
- United States v. HartDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Billy Merritt v. Gordon H. FaulknerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- United States v. The J. B. Williams Company, Inc., and Parkson Advertising Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Leimer v. Woods, Housing ExpediterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- Grossblatt v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Ochoa v. American Oil CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.