Legal Opinion

Shechtman v. Sverdrup & Parcel Consultants, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 25, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol H. Arber, J.), entered November 18, 1994, which denied plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on the first cause of action,* denied defendant Kiernan’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the entire complaint as against him, and granted the cross motion by defendant Sverdrup and Parcel Consultants ("S&PC”) for partial summary judgment only to the extent of dismissing the third cause of action, unanimously modified, on the law, defendants’ cross motions are granted in their entirety, the entire complaint is dismissed, and otherwise…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gaynor v. RockefellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
  2. Hartnett v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Gaynor v. RockefellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  4. Herzog v. Town of ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Duffy v. LongoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eldridge v. Carmel Central School District Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Charleson v. City of Long BeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Espie v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API