Legal Opinion

Espie v. Murphy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 5, 2006PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for legal malpractice and waste of municipal funds, the plaintiffs Thomas Espié and Betty Espié appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Pagones, J.), dated July 5, 2005, as granted the motion of the defendants Thomas Murphy, Michael Dungan, Mary Percesepe, Lorraine Tracey, Louis Murasso, Patrick Hinkley, Dennis Leary, Joseph Davis, John Baisley, Dominic Seminara, Thomas Bauer, Michael Sifone, Stephan Krakower, and Town of Poughkeepsie pursuant to CPLR 3211 to dismiss the amended complaint…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Perkins v. NorwichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Charleson v. City of Long BeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Shechtman v. Sverdrup & Parcel Consultants, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Eldridge v. Carmel Central School District Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API