People v. Vega

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The moving papers in support of defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence contained only conclusory assertions of legal grounds and failed to allege any evidentiary facts to support those grounds. The court’s sum*925mary rejection of the motion was proper (CPL 710.60 [3] [b]; People v Alexander, 88 AD2d 749). Although the court was required to set forth the reasons for its decision, the failure to do so was not fatal, as defendant’s papers were plainly inadequate (People v Jordan, 122 AD2d 224, 225).

Defendant was not deprived of effective…