Legal Opinion

People v. Torrence

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 18, 1987PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously af*1076firmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel because his attorney failed to make any pretrial motion (1) to dismiss the indictment on speedy trial grounds pursuant to CPL 30.30, (2) to suppress eyewitness identification testimony, (3) to suppress a statement made by defendant, and (4) for discovery. No claim is advanced that counsel’s representation during trial was inadequate, and we perceive no basis for such a claim.

We are persuaded that a dismissal motion on speedy trial grounds, if made, would not have been…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. LoveNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. DrozNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. People v. SinistajNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. People v. LaBreeNew York Court of Appeals · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. AyalaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. People v. ArnoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. People v. HughesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. People v. WalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. People v. GilbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API