People v. Bignall
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The court properly refused to preclude the prosecution from introducing evidence concerning the conversations that occurred between the police officer and defendant at the door of the premises where the controlled substances were found. Those conversations were evidentiary material not required to be included in a bill of particulars. Moreover, the court properly refused to impose the sanction of preclusion because defendant did not show that he was prejudiced by the prosecutor’s failure to provide *998that information in a bill of particulars. Defense…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. PavesiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. ElebyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. EmeryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. PortanovaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- People v. IrvineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. ZuritaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. HendricksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. LoftonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. RamlallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.