Legal Opinion

People v. Sugarman

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 16, 1926No. Docket Nos. 1360, 1361PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

The appellant Sugarman and one Harry Berman were charged by two counts of an information filed by the district attorney of Los Angeles County with burglariously entering a store and building in the city of Los Angeles, and with having on the same date committed grand larceny therein. Appellant Passarello was likewise charged with burglary and grand larceny upon the same premises, on the same date. The cases were consolidated and tried together in the superior court and the appellants were convicted upon each charge. This is an appeal by Sugarman and Passarello from the respective judgments…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. PeeteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. State v. McCormickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
  3. Simpson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
  4. Hogan v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  5. People v. AmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. In Re PasserelloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API