Legal Opinion

In Re Passerello

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 4, 1928No. Docket No. 1479PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.

Petitioner was tried on an information framed in two counts—burglary and grand larceny. The jury rendered its verdict finding him guilty on both counts and fixing the degree of burglary under the first count as of the first degree. The trial judge, in entering judgment, sentenced the petitioner on both counts in accord with the verdict of the jury, but appended an order purporting to find that petitioner was guilty of burglary in the second degree. An appeal was taken from the judgment and af firmed in People v. Sugarman and Passarello, 80 Cal. App. 321 [251 Pac. 949]. The board of prison…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. In Re BoothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. People v. SugarmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. BroderickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Oster v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. State Ex Rel. Ruffing v. JamesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  4. In Re SchneiderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API