Legal Opinion
James Julian, Inc. v. Raytheon Service Co.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided December 9, 1980PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTNETT, Vice Chancellor.
Pursuant to 10 Del.C., Ch. 57 (the Uniform Arbitration Act), plaintiff, James Julian, Inc. (“Julian”), filed this suit to compel defendant, Raytheon Service Company (“Raytheon Service”), to arbitrate disputes arising out of an agreement between the parties relating to the construction of a solid waste processing and recovery plant. Raytheon Service then moved to have this action dismissed or — in the alternative— stayed. For the reasons stated, I find that the dispute is arbitrable but the arbitration proceedings must be stayed pending the disposition of an antitrust…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Carcich v. Rederi A/B NordieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Walter J. Cobb, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Jerry LewisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Cornell & Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Barber & Ross Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- Nelson Bunker Hunt v. Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Lodge No. 12, District No. 37, International Ass'n of Machinists v. Cameron Iron Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Charles J. Frank, Inc. v. Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Ex Parte ColquittSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Malekzadeh v. WyshockCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1992
- New Castle County v. U.S. Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1989
- AMJ CAPITAL OZ FUND I, LLC v. MZF TRUSTDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.