Legal Opinion

First National Bank in Oshkosh v. Scieszinski

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1963PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDieterich, J.

The bank commenced the instant action on March 17, 1962, to require defendant AAA to purchase back the Palmer note under the terms of a dealer/contractor certificate which was executed as part of a transaction between AAA and the bank. Paragraph-4 of the complaint alleges the following:

"“That at the time said defendants discounted said note with plaintiff and obtained said $1,700 from plaintiff, and as part of the same transaction, said defendant partnership contracted in writing with plaintiff in manner and form as follows :
“ ‘As consideration for the purchase of the buyer’s note, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fillar v. Estate of FillarWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Weber v. KoleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Reimer v. ReimerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Charles v. Epperson & CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  2. First National Bank in Oshkosh v. ScieszinskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. (1974), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API